1-3 July 2026 · Accra, Ghana

Final Conference Evaluation

Overall feedback on the conference programme, organisation, learning value, partnerships, and future improvements.

Participant information

Your main participant category *
Which days did you attend? *
Did you attend in person for the full conference? *

Overall conference rating

Use a 1-5 scale: 1 = Very poor, 2 = Poor, 3 = Fair, 4 = Good, 5 = Excellent.

Overall, how would you rate the CIRAWA Agroecology Conference 2026? *
How relevant was the conference theme to your work or interests? *
How well did the conference address agroecology and nature-based solutions for sustainable food systems in Africa? *
How satisfied were you with the quality of keynote presentations? *
How satisfied were you with the scientific sessions? *
How satisfied were you with the workshops/trainings? *
How satisfied were you with the poster sessions and exhibitions? *
How useful were the policy and stakeholder discussions? *
How well did the conference connect research, policy, farmers, civil society, and development actors? *
How good were the opportunities for networking and partnership building? *
How well was the conference programme structured? *
How satisfied were you with time management across the conference? *

Organisation and logistics

How satisfied were you with registration and communication before/during the conference? *
How satisfied were you with the venue and meeting rooms? *
How satisfied were you with catering and refreshments? *
How satisfied were you with signage, guidance, and general event coordination? *
How inclusive and accessible was the conference environment? *
Which logistical area needs the most improvement?

Learning, impact, and follow-up

Did the conference help you identify new opportunities for collaboration, research, policy action, or field practice? *
Would you participate in a future CIRAWA or agroecology-related event? *
Would you recommend this conference to a colleague or partner? *
May the organisers contact you for follow-up discussions, partnerships, or clarification on your feedback?