Scientific Session 2 Evaluation | CIRAWA Agroecology Conference 2026

Participant information

Full Name

Your main participant category *

Researcher/Academic Farmer/Farmer organisation Policymaker/Government agency NGO/Civil society organisation Development partner Private sector/Industry Student Media Other If Other, please specify

Country/organisation

Session quality

Use a 1-5 scale: 1 = Very poor, 2 = Poor, 3 = Fair, 4 = Good, 5 = Excellent.

How relevant was this session to your work, interests, or organisation? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How clear were the session objectives or main message? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How useful was the content presented? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How practical or applicable were the ideas discussed? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How well was the session chaired/facilitated? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How good was the quality of discussion, questions, and responses? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How well did the session manage time? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How inclusive was the session of different perspectives, such as research, policy, farmer experience, gender, youth, and practice? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

Overall, how would you rate this session? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

Learning and usefulness

What was your main takeaway from this session? * What idea, method, partnership, policy suggestion, or practice from this session could be useful after the conference? What was unclear, missing, or weak in this session? What should be improved if a similar session is organised again?

Would you recommend a similar session in a future CIRAWA event? *

Yes No Maybe

Any other comments?

Scientific questions

How strong was the quality of evidence or research presented? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent

How useful were the presentations for research, policy, or field practice? *

1 Very poor 2 Poor 3 Fair 4 Good 5 Excellent